On September 21, 2026, Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Environment held a public-private partnership (PPP) forum in Can Tho on the Mekong Delta's shrimp industry. Convened through the Vietnam Partnership for Sustainable Agriculture (PSAV) together with the U.S. grains and bio-products industry body USGBC, the meeting took up the shift to a circular model and how to draw international funding into it. This is no distant matter for Japanese seafood buyers, because the items funders line up as conditions are almost the same as those the sourcing side asks of its suppliers.
Who ran the Can Tho public-private forum, and what was on the agenda
Co-chairs: the International Cooperation Department, the Fisheries Surveillance Department, and a U.S. grains body
According to the invitation VASEP issued beforehand, it began at 8 a.m. on September 21 at the Sheraton Can Tho. The co-chairs were senior officials from the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment's International Cooperation Department and its Department of Fisheries and Fisheries Surveillance, together with a USGBC representative. USGBC is written in the original as the 'U.S. Grains and Bio-products Council (Hội đồng Ngũ cốc và Sinh phẩm Hoa Kỳ),' placing a body that stands upstream in feed ingredients among the co-chairs. Those invited included the ministry's departments, the agriculture and environment departments of Can Tho and localities across the Mekong Delta, companies, associations, international organizations, development partners, and research institutes.
A discussion premised on a US$4.6 billion export industry
Vu Duc Dam Quang, deputy director of the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment's International Cooperation Department, said shrimp holds a heavy place in production, exports, and residents' livelihoods, especially in the Mekong Delta, and noted that shrimp export value in 2025 was about US$4.6 billion (original: 4.6 tỷ USD). tỷ means one billion, so 4.6 tỷ is US$4.6 billion, not US$460 million.
Vietnam's blue bonds are still at an early stage
An early example: the IFC's US$25 million investment in 2024
The source article writes that Vietnam's blue bond market is still at an early stage but that pioneering deals have begun to appear. The concrete example it cites is a 2024 deal in which the International Finance Corporation (IFC) put US$25 million (original: 25 triệu USD) into a blue bond issued by SeABank. By IFC's account, this was Vietnam's first blue bond, with proceeds going to sustainable activities related to the ocean and water, aquaculture and fisheries among them.
Please read this as secondhand. For this article we tried to consult IFC's own published materials but could not directly confirm the relevant release. What follows relies on IFC's account as conveyed by the Vietnamese press, and the breakdown of terms and amounts has not been checked against primary sources. What is easy to misread is the investment amount versus the total issuance: what is reported is the amount IFC put in, not the size of the bond itself. The use of proceeds is also ocean- and water-related, not a dedicated allocation for shrimp farming. And it is not new funding decided at this forum; a deal from two years ago is being cited as an example marking the market's entry point.
Set against Asia-Pacific's US$5 billion, it comes to 0.5%
Benedict Tan, who serves as program director at Hatch Blue's Singapore base and handles the region's startup-support programs for Asia-Pacific, explained that about US$5 billion (original: 5 tỷ USD) was raised through blue loans and blue bonds in the region between 2020 and September 2026. That is the combined total of loans and bonds — neither a figure for Vietnam alone nor one limited to shrimp. Against US$5 billion, US$25 million comes to 0.5% (our own calculation).
That 0.5%, however, is a ratio that places two things of different nature side by side. The denominator is the total the whole region raised through loans and bonds; the numerator is the amount one institution put into a single bond, and it is not a figure that represents all of Vietnam's blue finance. The source article, too, presents this contrast as showing both the market's starting point and its room to grow.
It is not only a question of money: there are not enough records to use as collateral
The producer-side weaknesses Save the Children laid out
At the meeting, Save the Children Vietnam proposed a framework it called a 'green investment chain.' The idea is to connect communities, cooperatives, and local governments with companies, buyers, banks, investors, climate funds, and technical partners to build shrimp enterprises able to absorb green finance. In the organization's analysis, the bottleneck is not just a shortage of funds: on the producer side there are climate and ecosystem risks, small scale, weak technology and management, a lack of traceability and certification, thin connections to markets, and insufficient collateral assets. Its point is that simply adding a credit line to a high-risk livelihood system does not amount to green finance.
This point overlaps with sourcing practice on the Japanese side. What buyers require —pond histories, medication records, and the linking of shipment lots— is almost the same material banks want to see when extending credit. Certified sourcing areas are easy to work with not only for quality assurance but also because the records have already been verified once by outside eyes. 721 ha of ASC-certified black tiger shrimp in Dam Doi— cases like this, where certification is assembled across a consolidated area, work for both sourcing and finance for exactly that reason.
202 households, 14.5 ha registered, and 8,010 saplings confirmed growing
The organization also presented implementation figures. More than 202 farming households received support in practicing ecosystem-based, climate-adaptive shrimp farming. For the 2026 crop, 40 households registered new mangrove planting over 14.5 ha. As of the end of June 2026, 8,010 Avicennia (mắm) saplings were confirmed growing, with a reported survival rate of 80%. The original '8.010' uses the period as a thousands separator, meaning 8,010 saplings.
Worth noting is that the 14.5 ha is a 'registration,' not a report of completed planting, and that the whole effort is at pilot scale. Seven proposals for a Bac Lieu farming zone that had sat idle for nine years— plot-level projects like this, and rebuilding a Nghe An farm after typhoon damage— single-household investments like this each differ by an order of magnitude in the amount of money required.
Exports to Japan were US$388.5 million, up 6.1%, but China took the growth
By market, January–August 2026 (Vietnam Customs, compiled by VASEP)
| Market | January-August 2026 | Year on year |
|---|---|---|
| China and Hong Kong | just under US$1.12 billion | +35.9% |
| US | US$436.1 million | -11.7% |
| Japan | US$388.5 million | +6.1% |
| EU | US$355.3 million | -3.6% |
| CPTPP total | US$901 million | +11.0% |
| All shrimp | US$3.3 billion | +12% |
Because the CPTPP total includes Japan, Australia, and Canada, its base overlaps with the Japan line, so you cannot read it by summing up and reconciling against the whole. China and Hong Kong accounted for 34.1% of the total and pulled away from the rest in growth as well. Shrimp exports in August alone were US$478.5 million, up 4.2% year on year — slower than the 12% rise over the eight-month cumulative.
Exports to Japan are holding up on their high degree of processing
In the January–July tally, Japan was US$323.8 million, up 4%, the third-largest single market. VASEP sums up these seven months as China and lobster driving the growth, Australia widening its room, and Japan consolidating its processing advantage. In markets where processing weighs heavily, yield, consistency of lots, and accuracy of paperwork matter more to pricing than cheap raw material. Whether outside funding flows into equipment investment ties directly to those three.
There is now one more question you can put to suppliers
Is there a funding source behind the equipment?
What this meeting gives Japanese buyers is the ability to hear talk of equipment as talk of money. When told 'we built a new pond,' the odds that it is still running a few years later change depending on whether it was self-funded, a short-term loan from a local bank, or medium-to-long-term money involving development finance or a climate fund. The following three points can be asked on a plant visit or in a negotiation alike.
- The equipment added in the last three years, and the type of funding behind it (own funds / local bank / development finance or fund)
- In what units per-pond medication and feeding records are kept, and how they are linked to shipment lots
- The scope of the certifications held (area of covered ponds, covered species, expiry date) and the timing of the next audit
In quotes, fix the transaction stage first
Before comparing unit prices, align which stage a given price refers to. The beach price at pond harvest, delivery to the processing plant, ex-factory after processing, export FOB, and CIF landed in Japan all show different numbers for the same shrimp. Settle in the first email whether the counterpart's offer is 'delivered to the processing plant' or 'FOB,' and decide at the same time how size grades and the glaze rate are handled.
Whether it can be brought into Japan must be checked item by item
The figures above show that Vietnamese shrimp is entering Japan, but that does not mean 'a product from this area, in this processed form, can be sold in Japan as is.' The degree of processing, the use of additives, residue standards, and labeling requirements all change by item. When considering a new form, consult the importer and the relevant quarantine station in advance, and fix the required inspection items and documents first.
The one sheet to put out first in your next negotiation
When, where, and who held this meeting
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Name | Public-private partnership (PPP) forum to promote a circular economy for the Mekong Delta's shrimp industry |
| Date and time | Monday, September 21, 2026, starting at 8 a.m. |
| Venue | Sheraton Can Tho (209 Đ. 30 Tháng 4, Ninh Kiều, Cần Thơ) |
| Organizers | Co-hosted by Vietnam's Ministry of Agriculture and Environment (through PSAV) and the U.S. Grains and Bio-products Council (USGBC) |
| Co-chairs | International Cooperation Department, Department of Fisheries and Fisheries Surveillance, and a USGBC representative |
What to ask of your supplier is a single sheet on equipment and funding
If there is one thing you can act on now, it is to send your current shrimp supplier a request to provide, on a single sheet, 'the equipment added in the last three years and where its funding came from.' A counterpart who can answer is one whose records are in place — easy to deal with for the same reason whether viewed by a bank or by the sourcing side. Rather than narrowing down sourcing areas by certification alone, this one sheet tells you more in less time.